Repeat-client billing · manual review
Accountant handoff coverage worksheet
Compare an accountant’s requested document set with your manually confirmed files and review status. Expose missing or unreviewed records before handoff.
Try the invoice tool now ↗The existing invoice tool is separate. Start without signing in; free output has branding and usage limits. This review is not a new automatic billing, bank-sync or membership feature.
What decision does this help with?
Start from a request list agreed with your accountant for one period. Use a different requirement code for each requested record category, then record the filename and your actual review status. Required here means requested for this handoff, not a legal rule. The worksheet separates ready items, files still awaiting your review and missing requested items. It helps recurring monthly handoffs stay complete without assuming that an invoice register substitutes for original documents.
Start with filled fictional records
Use internal codes instead of personal or bank details. Entries are reviewed locally in this page and are not uploaded, saved to an account or written into a draft. Keep a separate copy before leaving.
Fictional worked case · not customer evidence
Expected result and how to read it
The example has three requested requirements: the invoice register is labelled ready, original invoices have a filename but remain unreviewed, and payment records are missing. Only one of three requested requirements is labelled ready. The optional note does not reduce required coverage. A listed ZIP filename does not prove that its files exist or belong to the requested period.
Before using the result
- Choose a review date and source scope where requested. Preserve original invoices and agreements; a pasted row is not evidence by itself.
- Use one consistent currency, unit and amount basis. Correct a source conflict before copying a result to another record.
- Read every flagged or excluded record. A blank record is not assumed to be a verified zero. Editing inputs clears the prior result and disables its download.
- Download the review for your own working papers if useful. The CSV is a manual review file, not an invoice or an accounting-system import format.
Review up to 100 unique requirement codes. ready and unreviewed require a filename; missing requires a dash. This does not read attachments, inspect a ZIP, count invoices, validate retention obligations or transmit anything to your accountant. Confirm the period and contents separately and use your normal secure handoff channel.
Prepare only verified new work
Resolve differences in your original records first. Open the existing invoice tool only when the next charge has been independently checked. Re-invoicing an already issued balance would duplicate the request for payment.
Try the invoice tool now ↗Questions before acting
Does a match prove payment, approval or a valid invoice?
No. The result compares only entered facts under the displayed method. Verify original records and any agreement before taking action. It creates no invoice, receipt, approval or new right to charge.
Can I use this for regular customer reviews?
Review up to 100 unique requirement codes. ready and unreviewed require a filename; missing requires a dash. This does not read attachments, inspect a ZIP, count invoices, validate retention obligations or transmit anything to your accountant. Confirm the period and contents separately and use your normal secure handoff channel.
Source and independent method
The source below provides context for the workflow. The worked examples and comparison method on this page are independent manual aids, not a source-endorsed feature or a claim about another product’s current capabilities.
Reviewed 18 October 2026. A manual review file is not an invoice or a receipt.